On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
> There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
> It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
> The code quality
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
> There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
> It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
> The code quality issue will bring
From: Kan Liang
For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
From: Kan Liang
For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
introduced.
Signed-off-by:
4 matches
Mail list logo