On 16/07/13 14:53, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:38:11AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
>> validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
>> event. That was being done sporadically and without
>> considering integer
On 16/07/13 14:53, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:38:11AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
event. That was being done sporadically and without
considering integer overflows.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:38:11AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
> validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
> event. That was being done sporadically and without
> considering integer overflows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
event. That was being done sporadically and without
considering integer overflows.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 102
The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
event. That was being done sporadically and without
considering integer overflows.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 102
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:38:11AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
event. That was being done sporadically and without
considering integer overflows.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
6 matches
Mail list logo