Em Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 26/06/15 03:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:56:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> Will do the same tests with intel_pt as well, on a remote machine, add
> >> examples
> >> to
Em Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:47:39PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 26/06/15 16:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Another thing, the intel_bts implementation does not support
> >> "instructions" samples because there is no timing information to
> >> use to create periodic samples. But ca
On 26/06/15 16:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Another thing, the intel_bts implementation does not support
>> "instructions" samples because there is no timing information to
>> use to create periodic samples. But callchains are added only
>> to "instructions" samples so there are no callc
Em Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 26/06/15 03:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:56:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> Will do the same tests with intel_pt as well, on a remote machine, add
> >> examples
> >> to
On 26/06/15 03:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:56:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Will do the same tests with intel_pt as well, on a remote machine, add
>> examples
>> to the changeset logs and everything going well, aim for pushing for Ingo
>> s
Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:56:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Will do the same tests with intel_pt as well, on a remote machine, add
> examples
> to the changeset logs and everything going well, aim for pushing for Ingo
> soon,
So, I asked for callchains, with:
perf record -g
Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:45:57AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:37:01PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > >> On 23/06/15 02:00, A
Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:37:01PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo
> >>> glibc
On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo
>>> glibc-debuginfo-2.20-8.fc21.x86_64
>
>>> But then, it didn't even resolve the DS
Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo
> > glibc-debuginfo-2.20-8.fc21.x86_64
> > But then, it didn't even resolve the DSO, which it should, as I did
> > manually :-/
> > Will
On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:26:34PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> On 22/06/2015 9:24 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:41:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33:43PM
Em Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:26:34PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 22/06/2015 9:24 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:41:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >>Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33:43PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >>>On 19/06/2015 7:04
On 22/06/2015 9:24 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:41:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33:43PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
On 19/06/2015 7:04 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:41:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33:43PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 19/06/2015 7:04 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > >>Add support for
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33:43PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 19/06/2015 7:04 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >>Add support for Intel Processor Trace.
> >>Intel PT support fits within the new auxtrace infrastruct
On 19/06/2015 7:04 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
Add support for Intel Processor Trace.
Intel PT support fits within the new auxtrace infrastructure.
Recording is supporting by identifying the Intel PT PMU,
parsing opti
Em Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:04:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > Add support for Intel Processor Trace.
> >
> > Intel PT support fits within the new auxtrace infrastructure.
> > Recording is supporting by identifyi
Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Add support for Intel Processor Trace.
>
> Intel PT support fits within the new auxtrace infrastructure.
> Recording is supporting by identifying the Intel PT PMU,
> parsing options and setting up events. Decoding is supported
>
Add support for Intel Processor Trace.
Intel PT support fits within the new auxtrace infrastructure.
Recording is supporting by identifying the Intel PT PMU,
parsing options and setting up events. Decoding is supported
by queuing up trace data by cpu or thread and then decoding
synchronously deli
19 matches
Mail list logo
