Asias He writes:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:13AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I
>> commented on. I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to
>> that one. Since it's going through the virtio tree, don't wait
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:13AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I
commented on. I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to
that one. Since it's going through the virtio tree,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:13AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> > On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> > > On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> > >> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
> > >>
On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> > On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> >> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
> >> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
> >>
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
tcm_vhost
On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50%
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:13AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance
On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
>> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
>> tcm_vhost backends).
>>
>> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring
On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
tcm_vhost backends).
This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
> tcm_vhost backends).
>
> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which
> has already gone into
On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
tcm_vhost backends).
This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which
has already gone into
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
tcm_vhost backends).
This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which
has already gone into virtio-next today.
We hope this can go into virtio-next
This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
tcm_vhost backends).
This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which
has already gone into virtio-next today.
We hope this can go into virtio-next
14 matches
Mail list logo
