; ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI ba
..@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> controlle
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:24:23PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just a
A big +1 to the below :) :) :)
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone
> On May 24, 2016, at 13:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Ga
Hi Bjorn,
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:39:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> I don't think of ECAM support itself as a "driver". It's just a
> service available to drivers, similar to OF resource parsing.
>
> Per PCI Firmw
Hi Gabriele, all,
On 05/24/2016 03:23 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>> Sorry Gab, I guess I was really responding to earlier messages :)
>>
>> I don't really have much to say here, except that it doesn't seem
>> right to have an MCFG that describes a non-standard ECAM mapping.
>
> The ACPI table t
..@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> controller
>
&
..@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> controller
>
&
On 05/23/2016 06:56 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The only way this can be implemented is by pretending that the
> ACPI/PCI arch/arm64 implementation is generic code (that's what this
> series does), move it to /drivers (where it is in this series), and
> implement _DSD vendor specific bindings (
ts.linaro.org; linux-
>>>> p...@vger.kernel.org; dhd...@apm.com; liviu.du...@arm.com;
>>>> dda...@caviumnetworks.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; linux-
>>>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulp
org;
>>> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
>>> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
>>> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic A
; andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> > controller
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On 20 May 2016 at 1
On 5/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
> following logic parts:
> 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
> 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64.
> 3. Use new MCFG inter
l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> co
在 2016/5/10 23:19, Tomasz Nowicki 写道:
From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
following logic parts:
1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64.
3. Use new MCFG interface and imp
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14:03AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Hi Ard
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> [...]
> >>
> >> Is the PCIe root complex so special that you cannot simpl
On 20 May 2016 at 10:40, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
[...]
>>
>> Is the PCIe root complex so special that you cannot simply describe an
>> implementation that is not PNP0408 compatible as something else
l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
&
On 20 May 2016 at 10:01, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote:
>>> Hi Tomasz, all,
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>>
On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>>>
>> v6 -> v
On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard, Jon
Hi Gabriele :)
> In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP
> that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space.
Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already.
> A possible ACPI table solution was discussed a
On 05/10/2016 11:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> This has been tested on Cavium ThunderX server. Any help in reviewing and
> testing is very appreciated.
Boot log from Intel Itanium 2 system attached.
Jon.
[0.00] Linux version 4.6.0-rc7.jcm_tomasz_pciv7_test+ (jcm@hamartia)
(gcc version
l.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> robert.rich...@caviumnetworks.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com;
> msal...@redhat.com; Wangyijing; m...@semihalf.com;
> andrea.ga...@linaro.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI h
Hi Ard,
On 05/20/2016 03:37 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz, all,
>>
>> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>
>>> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>>
> v6 -> v7
> - drop quirks handling
Maybe I missed so
On 20 May 2016 at 06:41, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, all,
>
> On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>
>> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>
v6 -> v7
- drop quirks handling
>>>
>>> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it
>>> decided to dro
Hi Tomasz, all,
On 05/11/2016 07:08 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 11.05.2016 12:41, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>>> v6 -> v7
>>> - drop quirks handling
>>
>> Maybe I missed something in the v6 discussion thread; when was it
>> decided to drop quirk handling?
>
> I had such requests in previous ser
On 05/10/2016 10:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
following logic parts:
1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64.
3. Use new MCFG interface a
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
> following logic parts:
> 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
> 2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64.
> 3. Use new
.@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linaro-
> a...@lists.linaro.org; j...@redhat.com; andrea.ga...@linaro.org;
> dhd...@apm.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; liudongdong (C);
> c...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for
Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
controller
From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
following logic parts:
1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64
rg; Tomasz Nowicki
> Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host
> controller
>
> From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
> following logic parts:
> 1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
> 2. Necessary fix
>From the functionality point of view this series may be split into the
following logic parts:
1. New ECAM API and update for users of the pci-host-common API
2. Necessary fixes as the preparation for using driver on ARM64.
3. Use new MCFG interface and implement generic ACPI based PCI host control
31 matches
Mail list logo