On 8/18/20 5:23 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:10:34PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/20 3:27 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at
>> 06:46:53PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
[...]
a get_file
>> rather fcheck followed by get_file_rcu:
>>
>>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:10:34PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 8/18/20 3:27 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 06:46:53PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> >> From: KP Singh
> >>
> >> Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets, add local storage for inodes.
> >> The life-cycle of
On 8/18/20 3:27 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 06:46:53PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>> From: KP Singh
>>
>> Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets, add local storage for inodes.
>> The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the inode.
>> i.e. the storage
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 06:46:53PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh
>
> Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets, add local storage for inodes.
> The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the inode.
> i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning inode.
>
> The
From: KP Singh
Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets, add local storage for inodes.
The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the inode.
i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning inode.
The BPF LSM allocates an __rcu pointer to the bpf_local_storage in the
5 matches
Mail list logo