Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9
>> where
>> I faced the problem initially.
>
> Sure, see the attached patch for 3.10.9.
Thanks, it works for my case. You can
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9 where
> I faced the problem initially.
Sure, see the attached patch for 3.10.9.
--
Dan Aloni
>From e323d3b4fdc1e61c3c39dfb3733d8b8c56f63b00 Mon
Hi Dan,
thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9 where
I faced the problem initially.
linux-3.10.9 # patch -p1 < ../patches/vm_map_count.patch
patching file fs/binfmt_elf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1415 (offset -14 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1430 (offset -14 lines).
A high setting of max_map_count, and a process core-dumping with
a large enough vm_map_count could result in an NT_FILE note not
being written, and the kernel crashing immediately later because
it has assumed otherwise.
Reproduction of the bug described here:
A high setting of max_map_count, and a process core-dumping with
a large enough vm_map_count could result in an NT_FILE note not
being written, and the kernel crashing immediately later because
it has assumed otherwise.
Reproduction of the bug described here:
Hi Dan,
thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9 where
I faced the problem initially.
linux-3.10.9 # patch -p1 ../patches/vm_map_count.patch
patching file fs/binfmt_elf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1415 (offset -14 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1430 (offset -14 lines).
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi Dan,
thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9 where
I faced the problem initially.
Sure, see the attached patch for 3.10.9.
--
Dan Aloni
From e323d3b4fdc1e61c3c39dfb3733d8b8c56f63b00 Mon Sep 17
Dan Aloni wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi Dan,
thank you for your work on my issue. I would like to test it on 3.10.9
where
I faced the problem initially.
Sure, see the attached patch for 3.10.9.
Thanks, it works for my case. You can add my
8 matches
Mail list logo