On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:03:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 01:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On 01/16/2014 01:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014
On 01/16/2014 01:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:03:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/16/2014 01:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/15/2014 03:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> > On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> We used to limit the number of packets queued through
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
> >> has several issues:
> >>
> >> -
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
>> has several issues:
>>
>> - tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
>>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
> has several issues:
>
> - tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
> to control the packets queued by device may cause
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
has several issues:
- tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
to control the packets queued by device may cause confusion.
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
has several issues:
- tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
to control
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
has several issues:
- tx_queue_length is
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We used to limit the number of packets queued through
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:36:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 05:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/14/2014 04:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We
We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
has several issues:
- tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
to control the packets queued by device may cause confusion.
- After commit 6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523
We used to limit the number of packets queued through tx_queue_length. This
has several issues:
- tx_queue_length is the control of qdisc queue length, simply reusing it
to control the packets queued by device may cause confusion.
- After commit 6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523
20 matches
Mail list logo