RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

t; a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > > head room that will be

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

rg; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > "K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > >

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

"K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. We have the following in include/linux/netdevice.h: #if defined(CONFIG_WLAN) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AX25) # if defined(CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH) # define

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet > is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer > for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't need to > ask for

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

ject.org; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > "K. Y. Srinivasan" <k...@microsoft.com> writes: > > > The rndis header

RE: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

ject.org; o...@aepfle.de; > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head > room in the skb > > K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet > is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer > for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

"K. Y. Srinivasan" writes: > The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default > head room that will be available in the skb. We have the following in include/linux/netdevice.h: #if defined(CONFIG_WLAN) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AX25) # if

[PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't need to ask for additional head room. Signed-off-by:

[PATCH net-next 08/10] hv_netvsc: Don't ask for additional head room in the skb

The rndis header is 116 bytes big and can be placed in the default head room that will be available in the skb. Since the netvsc packet is less than 48 bytes, we can use the skb control buffer for the netvsc packet. With these changes we don't need to ask for additional head room. Signed-off-by: