Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] can: use __dev_get_by_index instead of dev_get_by_index to find interface

On 14.01.2014 08:41, Ying Xue wrote: > As cgw_create_job() is always under rtnl_lock protection, > __dev_get_by_index() instead of dev_get_by_index() should be used to > find interface handler in it having us avoid to change interface > reference counter. > > Cc: Oliver Hartkopp >

Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] can: use __dev_get_by_index instead of dev_get_by_index to find interface

On 14.01.2014 08:41, Ying Xue wrote: As cgw_create_job() is always under rtnl_lock protection, __dev_get_by_index() instead of dev_get_by_index() should be used to find interface handler in it having us avoid to change interface reference counter. Cc: Oliver Hartkopp

[PATCH net-next 09/10] can: use __dev_get_by_index instead of dev_get_by_index to find interface

As cgw_create_job() is always under rtnl_lock protection, __dev_get_by_index() instead of dev_get_by_index() should be used to find interface handler in it having us avoid to change interface reference counter. Cc: Oliver Hartkopp Signed-off-by: Ying Xue --- net/can/gw.c | 15 +--

[PATCH net-next 09/10] can: use __dev_get_by_index instead of dev_get_by_index to find interface

As cgw_create_job() is always under rtnl_lock protection, __dev_get_by_index() instead of dev_get_by_index() should be used to find interface handler in it having us avoid to change interface reference counter. Cc: Oliver Hartkopp socket...@hartkopp.net Signed-off-by: Ying Xue