[PATCH net-next 13/14] rxrpc: Be consistent about switch value in rxrpc_send_call_packet()

[David Howells]

rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements
rather than using pkt->whdr.type.  This might give the compiler an easier
job of uninitialised variable checking.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
---

 net/rxrpc/output.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index aa0507214b31..0b21ed859de7 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type)
 , iov, ioc, len);
 
if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) {
-   switch (pkt->whdr.type) {
+   switch (type) {
case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK:
rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason,
  ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew),

[PATCH net-next 13/14] rxrpc: Be consistent about switch value in rxrpc_send_call_packet()

[David Howells]

rxrpc_send_call_packet() should use type in both its switch-statements
rather than using pkt->whdr.type.  This might give the compiler an easier
job of uninitialised variable checking.

Signed-off-by: David Howells 
---

 net/rxrpc/output.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index aa0507214b31..0b21ed859de7 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int rxrpc_send_call_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 type)
 , iov, ioc, len);
 
if (ret < 0 && call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE) {
-   switch (pkt->whdr.type) {
+   switch (type) {
case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACK:
rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, pkt->ack.reason,
  ntohs(pkt->ack.maxSkew),