Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 30 September 2015 at 17:31, Pravin Shelar wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >>> Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which >>> are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported),

Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Joe Stringer
On 30 September 2015 at 17:31, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >> Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which >> are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would be >> ignored. This could cause unexpected

Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: > Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which > are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would be > ignored. This could cause unexpected behaviour in future if userspace is > extended to support

Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: > Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which > are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would be > ignored. This could cause unexpected behaviour in future if userspace

Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 30 September 2015 at 17:31, Pravin Shelar wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >>> Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow

Re: [PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-30 Thread Joe Stringer
On 30 September 2015 at 17:31, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >> Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which >> are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would

[PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-29 Thread Joe Stringer
Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would be ignored. This could cause unexpected behaviour in future if userspace is extended to support additional bits but attempts to communicate with the current

[PATCH net 5/7] openvswitch: Reject ct_state unsupported bits

2015-09-29 Thread Joe Stringer
Previously, if userspace specified ct_state bits in the flow key which are currently undefined (and therefore unsupported), then they would be ignored. This could cause unexpected behaviour in future if userspace is extended to support additional bits but attempts to communicate with the current