On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
> critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 ("percpu-refcount:
> consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
> preepmtion operations
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
> critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 ("percpu-refcount:
> consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
> preepmtion operations
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
> critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 ("percpu-refcount:
> consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
> preepmtion operations
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 ("percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with rcu_read_[un]lock() citing that there isn't
any advantage in
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 (percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU) fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with rcu_read_[un]lock() citing that there isn't
any advantage in
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 (percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU) fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 (percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU) fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 (percpu-refcount:
consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU) fixed it by converting the
preepmtion operations with
8 matches
Mail list logo