Em Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:37:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2015/01/30 23:21), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So perhaps I need a 'noinline' _and_ '__sched', so that I have a "optimized
> > no-inline functions which have only function definition but no actual
> > instance
> > at
Em Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:37:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
(2015/01/30 23:21), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
So perhaps I need a 'noinline' _and_ '__sched', so that I have a optimized
no-inline functions which have only function definition but no actual
instance
at that
(2015/01/30 23:21), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
>> only function definition but no actual instance at
>> that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
>>
(2015/01/30 23:21), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual instance at
that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
instance
(2015/01/30 23:32), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>>> Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
>>> only function definition but no
(2015/01/30 23:32), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
> > only function definition but no actual instance at
> > that point. To fix this problem,
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
> only function definition but no actual instance at
> that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
> instance of the function.
>
> Without this patch:
>
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual instance at
that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
instance of the function.
Without this patch:
# perf probe -a __up
Failed to get entry address of __up.
Error: Failed to
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual instance at
that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
instance of the function.
Without this patch:
#
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:37:44PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual instance at
that point. To fix this problem, we
Fix to handle optimized no-inline functions which have
only function definition but no actual instance at
that point. To fix this problem, we need to find actual
instance of the function.
Without this patch:
# perf probe -a __up
Failed to get entry address of __up.
Error: Failed to
12 matches
Mail list logo