Re: [PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi, On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please >> test this patch. This patch

Re: [PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi, On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please >> test this patch. This patch replaces yours, as many devices seem to be >>

Re: [PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi Hans, On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please > test this patch. This patch replaces yours, as many devices seem to be > affected so a whitelist is the better approach here.

Re: [PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi Hans, On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please > test this patch. This patch replaces yours, as many devices seem to be > affected so a whitelist is the better approach here. I'll let the

[PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi All, This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please test this patch. This patch replaces yours, as many devices seem to be affected so a whitelist is the better approach here. Regards, Hans

[PATCH resend] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: Add DMI check before binding to the WMI interface

Hi All, This is a resend with Kai Heng Feng added to the Cc. Kai can you please test this patch. This patch replaces yours, as many devices seem to be affected so a whitelist is the better approach here. Regards, Hans