On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:27:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
> > be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 09:27:46AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
> > be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start rcutorture
> > could inflict far
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
> be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start rcutorture
> could inflict far heavier damage on the system, but it doesn't
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
> be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start rcutorture
> could inflict far heavier damage on the system, but it doesn't hurt to
> change it and doing
This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start rcutorture
could inflict far heavier damage on the system, but it doesn't hurt to
change it and doing so avoids script-generated noise.
Reported-by: Tobin C. Harding
This commit changes the %p printk() in rcutorture to %pK. This could
be considered irrelevant, given that any user able to start rcutorture
could inflict far heavier damage on the system, but it doesn't hurt to
change it and doing so avoids script-generated noise.
Reported-by: Tobin C. Harding
6 matches
Mail list logo