On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 13:18 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> > device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It
> > seems
> > a confusion with
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 13:18 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> > device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It
> > seems
> > a confusion with
Hi Andy,
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
> a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
> platforms.
>
> Revert
Hi Andy,
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
> a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
> platforms.
>
> Revert
Hi,
On 03/24/2017 07:47 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lu Baolu,
>
> On 2017년 03월 24일 20:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년
Hi,
On 03/24/2017 07:47 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lu Baolu,
>
> On 2017년 03월 24일 20:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년
Hi Lu Baolu,
On 2017년 03월 24일 20:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> The commit
Hi Lu Baolu,
On 2017년 03월 24일 20:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> The commit
On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > > On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for
> > > >
On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 20:03 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > > On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for
> > > >
Hi,
On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
>>> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform
Hi,
On 2017년 03월 22일 22:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
>>> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> > device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It
> > seems
> > a confusion with
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 10:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> > device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It
> > seems
> > a confusion with
Hi,
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
> a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
> platforms.
Only for the
Hi,
On 2017년 03월 22일 03:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
> device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
> a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
> platforms.
Only for the
The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
platforms.
Revert commit 942c7924a51e to avoid any confusion in the future.
Cc: Lu
The commit 942c7924a51e introduced a check for ACPI handle for the
device that never appears on any ACPI-enabled platform so far. It seems
a confusion with extcon-intel-int3496 which does support ACPI-enabled
platforms.
Revert commit 942c7924a51e to avoid any confusion in the future.
Cc: Lu
18 matches
Mail list logo