On 10/05/2017 01:14 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
>> I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
>> Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
On 10/05/2017 01:14 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
>> I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
>> Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
>
> Ouch! How did it
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
> Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
Ouch! How did it work before?
Applied to
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
> Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
Ouch! How did it work before?
Applied to for-current, thanks! Please
I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
I2C drive setup structure is not properly allocated.
Make it static instead of pointer to store driver data.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
6 matches
Mail list logo