On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The patch is marked for memcg but I do not see any direct relation.
> I am not familiar with this code enough probably but if this really is
> memcg kmem related, please do not forget to CC Vladimir
>
Yes, the next iteration should be closer
The patch is marked for memcg but I do not see any direct relation.
I am not familiar with this code enough probably but if this really is
memcg kmem related, please do not forget to CC Vladimir
On Wed 26-10-16 10:41:28, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> While testing OBJFREELIST_SLAB integration with pagea
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> Okay, I think for SLAB we can allow everything except the two flags
> mentioned here.
No no no. Just allow the flags already defined in include/linux/slab.h
that can be specd by subsystems when they call into the slab allocators.
> Should I deny certa
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Hmmm...Doesnt this belong into memcg_create_kmem_cache() or into
> kmem_cache_create() in mm/slab_common.h? Definitely not in an allocator
> specific function since this is an issue for all allocators.
>
> memcg_create_kmem_cache() simpl
Hmmm...Doesnt this belong into memcg_create_kmem_cache() or into
kmem_cache_create() in mm/slab_common.h? Definitely not in an allocator
specific function since this is an issue for all allocators.
memcg_create_kmem_cache() simply assumes that it can pass flags from the
kmem_cache structure to kme
While testing OBJFREELIST_SLAB integration with pagealloc, we found a
bug where kmem_cache(sys) would be created with both CFLGS_OFF_SLAB &
CFLGS_OBJFREELIST_SLAB.
The original kmem_cache is created early making OFF_SLAB not possible.
When kmem_cache(sys) is created, OFF_SLAB is possible and if pa
6 matches
Mail list logo