On 6/15/2016 6:27 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> Yeb, I read Johannes's thread which suggests one-cgroup-per-app model.
> It does make sense to me. It is worth to try although I guess it's not
> easy to control memory usage on demand, not proactively.
> If we can do, maybe we don't need per-process
On 6/15/2016 6:27 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> Yeb, I read Johannes's thread which suggests one-cgroup-per-app model.
> It does make sense to me. It is worth to try although I guess it's not
> easy to control memory usage on demand, not proactively.
> If we can do, maybe we don't need per-process
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:59:40PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
> >
> > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> > feedback from akpm was that he want to know
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:59:40PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
> >
> > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> > feedback from akpm was that he want to know
Hi Chen,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:50:00PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote:
> Hi Minchan,
>
> On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
> >
> > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> > feedback from akpm was
Hi Chen,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:50:00PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote:
> Hi Minchan,
>
> On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
> >
> > I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> > feedback from akpm was
On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
>
> I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
>
> Since then, I got question from several embedded
On 6/13/2016 1:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
>
> I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
>
> Since then, I got question from several embedded
在 2016/6/13 19:50, Chen Feng 写道:
Hi Minchan,
On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi all,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
Since then, I
在 2016/6/13 19:50, Chen Feng 写道:
Hi Minchan,
On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi all,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
Since then, I
Hi Minchan,
On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
>
> I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
>
> Since then, I got question from
Hi Minchan,
On 2016/6/13 15:50, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
>
> I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
> feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
>
> Since then, I got question from
Hi all,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
Since then, I got question from several embedded people of various
company "why it's not merged into
Hi all,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728
I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.
Since then, I got question from several embedded people of various
company "why it's not merged into
14 matches
Mail list logo