On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 10:57 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> It would probably need to take struct timespec64 as an argument. Pass by
> structure might be difficult to swallow, so pass by pointer?
Every %p extension is passed via a pointer.
On 07/20/2017 03:33 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 12:57 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
On 07/18/2017 10:50 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that
printing
its content field b
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 12:57 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> On 07/18/2017 10:50 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that
> > > printing
> > > its content field by field.
> > >
> > > In thi
On 07/18/2017 10:50 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
its content field by field.
In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
easier.
Hey Andy.
I just
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 20:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:50 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that
> > > printing
> > > its content field by field.
> > >
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:50 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that
> > printing
> > its content field by field.
> >
> > In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
> its content field by field.
>
> In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
> easier.
Hey Andy.
I just saw a patch with a printk for rtc t
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 18:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
> > > its content field by field.
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
>> its content field by field.
>>
>> In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
>> easi
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
> its content field by field.
>
> In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
> easier.
>
> There are still users of detailed output of the s
Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that printing
its content field by field.
In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
easier.
There are still users of detailed output of the struct rtc_time, but we
can introduce an additional extension for them in
11 matches
Mail list logo
