Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] clk: twl6040: Correct clk_ops

On 05/30, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Since the drover only supports prepare callbacks, the use of is_enabled is > not correct, it should be handling is_prepared. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of

Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] clk: twl6040: Correct clk_ops

On 05/30, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Since the drover only supports prepare callbacks, the use of is_enabled is > not correct, it should be handling is_prepared. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a

[PATCH v1 01/14] clk: twl6040: Correct clk_ops

Since the drover only supports prepare callbacks, the use of is_enabled is not correct, it should be handling is_prepared. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi --- drivers/clk/clk-twl6040.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v1 01/14] clk: twl6040: Correct clk_ops

Since the drover only supports prepare callbacks, the use of is_enabled is not correct, it should be handling is_prepared. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi --- drivers/clk/clk-twl6040.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-twl6040.c