Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret_handler()

2013-04-07 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Anton Arapov [2013-04-03 18:00:31]: > Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update > existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and > uretprobe respectively. > > v1 changes: > * add bp_vaddr argument to ->ret_handler() > > RFCv5

Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer-ret_handler()

2013-04-07 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
* Anton Arapov an...@redhat.com [2013-04-03 18:00:31]: Enclose return probes implementation, introduce -ret_handler() and update existing code to rely on -handler() *and* -ret_handler() for uprobe and uretprobe respectively. v1 changes: * add bp_vaddr argument to -ret_handler() RFCv5

[PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret_handler()

2013-04-03 Thread Anton Arapov
Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and uretprobe respectively. v1 changes: * add bp_vaddr argument to ->ret_handler() RFCv5 changes: * don't remove uprobe in case there are no uprobe

[PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer-ret_handler()

2013-04-03 Thread Anton Arapov
Enclose return probes implementation, introduce -ret_handler() and update existing code to rely on -handler() *and* -ret_handler() for uprobe and uretprobe respectively. v1 changes: * add bp_vaddr argument to -ret_handler() RFCv5 changes: * don't remove uprobe in case there are no uprobe