Hello Amit, Javi,
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:20:48AM +0100, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:21:48AM +0100, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> > Hi Javi,
> >
> > On 5/29/14, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > Hi Amit,
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:21:48AM +0100, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Hi Javi,
>
> On 5/29/14, Javi Merino wrote:
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> This patch upgrades the ACPI cpufreq cooling portions to use the generic
> >> cpufreq cooling
Hi Javi,
On 5/29/14, Javi Merino wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patch upgrades the ACPI cpufreq cooling portions to use the generic
>> cpufreq cooling infrastructure. There should not be any functionality
>> related changes as th
Hi Amit,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch upgrades the ACPI cpufreq cooling portions to use the generic
> cpufreq cooling infrastructure. There should not be any functionality
> related changes as the same behaviour is provided by the generic
> cpuf
This patch upgrades the ACPI cpufreq cooling portions to use the generic
cpufreq cooling infrastructure. There should not be any functionality
related changes as the same behaviour is provided by the generic
cpufreq APIs with the notifier mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
drivers
5 matches
Mail list logo
