On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:01PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Previously, bio_kmalloc() and bio_alloc_bioset() behaved slightly
> different because there was some almost-duplicated code - this fixes
> some of that.
>
> The important change is that previously bio_kmalloc() always set
>
Previously, bio_kmalloc() and bio_alloc_bioset() behaved slightly
different because there was some almost-duplicated code - this fixes
some of that.
The important change is that previously bio_kmalloc() always set
bi_io_vec = bi_inline_vecs, even if nr_iovecs == 0 - unlike
bio_alloc_bioset().
Previously, bio_kmalloc() and bio_alloc_bioset() behaved slightly
different because there was some almost-duplicated code - this fixes
some of that.
The important change is that previously bio_kmalloc() always set
bi_io_vec = bi_inline_vecs, even if nr_iovecs == 0 - unlike
bio_alloc_bioset().
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:35:01PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Previously, bio_kmalloc() and bio_alloc_bioset() behaved slightly
different because there was some almost-duplicated code - this fixes
some of that.
The important change is that previously bio_kmalloc() always set
bi_io_vec =
4 matches
Mail list logo