Hi Mark
On 20 October 2016 at 23:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org
Hi Mark
On 20 October 2016 at 23:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>> > > From: Fu Wei
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> > > From: Fu Wei
> >
> > > This patchset depends on the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> > > From: Fu Wei
> >
> > > This patchset depends on the following patchset:
> >
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Fu Wei
>
> > This patchset depends on the following patchset:
> > [UPDATE PATCH V11 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT)
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Fu Wei
>
> > This patchset depends on the following patchset:
> > [UPDATE PATCH V11 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
> This patchset depends on the following patchset:
> [UPDATE PATCH V11 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/12/949
Is there a branch with
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
> This patchset depends on the following patchset:
> [UPDATE PATCH V11 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/12/949
Is there a branch with these anywhere? I
Hi Xiongfeng Wang,
On 30 September 2016 at 08:40, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> for sbsa watchdog part, Tested-by: wangxiongfe...@huawei.com on D05 board.
Got it, thanks again for your help
>
> On 2016/9/29 2:17, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Fu Wei
Hi Xiongfeng Wang,
On 30 September 2016 at 08:40, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> for sbsa watchdog part, Tested-by: wangxiongfe...@huawei.com on D05 board.
Got it, thanks again for your help
>
> On 2016/9/29 2:17, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Fu Wei
>>
>> This patchset:
>> (1)Preparation
for sbsa watchdog part, Tested-by: wangxiongfe...@huawei.com on D05 board.
On 2016/9/29 2:17, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
>
> This patchset:
> (1)Preparation for adding GTDT support in arm_arch_timer:
> 1. Move some enums and marcos to header file;
>
for sbsa watchdog part, Tested-by: wangxiongfe...@huawei.com on D05 board.
On 2016/9/29 2:17, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
>
> This patchset:
> (1)Preparation for adding GTDT support in arm_arch_timer:
> 1. Move some enums and marcos to header file;
> 2. Add a
From: Fu Wei
This patchset:
(1)Preparation for adding GTDT support in arm_arch_timer:
1. Move some enums and marcos to header file;
2. Add a new enum for spi type;
3. Improve printk relevant code.
(2)Introduce ACPI GTDT parser:
From: Fu Wei
This patchset:
(1)Preparation for adding GTDT support in arm_arch_timer:
1. Move some enums and marcos to header file;
2. Add a new enum for spi type;
3. Improve printk relevant code.
(2)Introduce ACPI GTDT parser: drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
14 matches
Mail list logo