+++ Vincent Whitchurch [09/11/18 14:53 +0100]:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> >
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [09/11/18 14:53 +0100]:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> >
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > > Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> > > relocations may rely on that bit being set
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > > Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> > > relocations may rely on that bit being set
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
relocations may rely on that bit being set in st_value, right?
Therefore we can only clear the bit _after_ relocations
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [01/11/18 16:29 +0100]:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
relocations may rely on that bit being set in st_value, right?
Therefore we can only clear the bit _after_ relocations
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> relocations may rely on that bit being set in st_value, right?
> Therefore we can only clear the bit _after_ relocations to the module
> are applied at runtime,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Could this be done in modpost? I'm guessing the answer is no as some
> relocations may rely on that bit being set in st_value, right?
> Therefore we can only clear the bit _after_ relocations to the module
> are applied at runtime,
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [31/10/18 09:42 +0100]:
Thumb-2 functions have the lowest bit set in the symbol value in the
symtab. When kallsyms are generated for the vmlinux, the kallsyms are
generated from the output of nm, and nm clears the lowest bit.
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a vmlinux |
+++ Vincent Whitchurch [31/10/18 09:42 +0100]:
Thumb-2 functions have the lowest bit set in the symbol value in the
symtab. When kallsyms are generated for the vmlinux, the kallsyms are
generated from the output of nm, and nm clears the lowest bit.
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a vmlinux |
Thumb-2 functions have the lowest bit set in the symbol value in the
symtab. When kallsyms are generated for the vmlinux, the kallsyms are
generated from the output of nm, and nm clears the lowest bit.
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a vmlinux | grep show_interrupts
95947: 8015dc89 686 FUNC
Thumb-2 functions have the lowest bit set in the symbol value in the
symtab. When kallsyms are generated for the vmlinux, the kallsyms are
generated from the output of nm, and nm clears the lowest bit.
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a vmlinux | grep show_interrupts
95947: 8015dc89 686 FUNC
12 matches
Mail list logo
