Hi Marc,
Hi Marc,
On 6/29/20 10:22 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-06-29 12:29, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Enric and Mark,
>>
>> On 6/29/20 8:05 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
>>>
>>> On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Enric,
Could you check this
Hi Chanwoo,
On 29/6/20 13:29, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Enric and Mark,
>
> On 6/29/20 8:05 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
>>
>> On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Enric,
>>>
>>> Could you check this issue? Your patch[1] causes this issue.
>>> As Marc
Hi Enric and Mark,
On 6/29/20 8:05 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
>
> On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Enric,
>>
>> Could you check this issue? Your patch[1] causes this issue.
>> As Marc mentioned, although rk3399-dmc.c handled 'rockchip,pmu'
>> as the
Hi Enric,
Could you check this issue? Your patch[1] causes this issue.
As Marc mentioned, although rk3399-dmc.c handled 'rockchip,pmu'
as the mandatory property, your patch[1] didn't add the 'rockchip,pmu'
property to the documentation.
[1] 9173c5ceb035 ("PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Pass ODT
and
Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Enric,
>
> Could you check this issue? Your patch[1] causes this issue.
> As Marc mentioned, although rk3399-dmc.c handled 'rockchip,pmu'
> as the mandatory property, your patch[1] didn't add the 'rockchip,pmu'
> property to the
Hi Enric,
On 6/29/20 8:26 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> On 29/6/20 13:29, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Enric and Mark,
>>
>> On 6/29/20 8:05 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
>>>
>>> On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Enric,
Could
Hi Chanwoo,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 03:43:37 +0100,
Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 6/23/20 12:28 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> It looks good to me. But, I think that it is not necessary
> fully kernel panic log about NULL pointer. It is enoughspsp
> just mentioning the NULL pointer
On 2020-06-29 12:29, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Enric and Mark,
On 6/29/20 8:05 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
Hi Chanwoo and Marc,
On 29/6/20 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Enric,
Could you check this issue? Your patch[1] causes this issue.
As Marc mentioned, although rk3399-dmc.c handled
Hi Marc,
On 6/23/20 12:28 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Booting a recent kernel on a rk3399-based system (nanopc-t4),
> equipped with a recent u-boot and ATF results in the following:
>
> [5.607431] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> address 01e4
> [
Booting a recent kernel on a rk3399-based system (nanopc-t4),
equipped with a recent u-boot and ATF results in the following:
[5.607431] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 01e4
[5.608219] Mem abort info:
[5.608469] ESR = 0x9604
[
10 matches
Mail list logo