On Mon 21-09-20 11:23:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 11:18, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > From: Jan Kara
> >
> > DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
> > referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for
> > "leaf" device
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 11:18, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> From: Jan Kara
>
> DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
> referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for "leaf"
> device drivers so that
> they don't have to duplicate common generic
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 8:31 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:30:03PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara
> >
> > DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
> > referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for
>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:30:03PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Jan Kara
>
> DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
> referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for "leaf"
> device drivers so that
> they don't have to duplicate common
From: Jan Kara
DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for "leaf"
device drivers so that
they don't have to duplicate common generic checks. High level code
should call dax_supported() helper which
5 matches
Mail list logo