On 08/29/2013 12:42 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
>>> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>>>
>>> It will fix 2
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
> > CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
> >
> > It will fix 2 bugs:
> >
> > "not check the return
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not check the return value of
On 08/29/2013 12:42 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not
On 08/23/2013 06:47 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
>>> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>>>
>>> It will fix 2
On 08/23/2013 06:47 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
> > CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
> >
> > It will fix 2 bugs:
> >
> > "not check the return
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>
> It will fix 2 bugs:
>
> "not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and
> __padata_add_cpu()".
> "need add 'break'
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and
__padata_add_cpu().
need add 'break' between
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:48PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:43:37PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not check the return value of
On 08/22/2013 02:43 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>
> It will fix 2 bugs:
>
> "not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and
> __padata_add_cpu()".
> "need add 'break' between
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
"not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu()".
"need add 'break' between CPU_UP_CANCELED and CPU_DOWN_FAILED".
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
On 08/22/2013 02:43 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and
__padata_add_cpu().
need add 'break' between CPU_UP_CANCELED and
Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
It will fix 2 bugs:
not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu().
need add 'break' between CPU_UP_CANCELED and CPU_DOWN_FAILED.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
14 matches
Mail list logo