Mike Kravetz 于2019年9月4日周三 上午5:26写道:
>
> On 8/29/19 6:50 AM, Zhigang Lu wrote:
> > From: Zhigang Lu
> >
> > When mmapping an existing hugetlbfs file with MAP_POPULATE, we find
> > it is very time consuming. For example, mmapping a 128GB file takes
> > about 50 milliseconds. Sampling with
On 8/29/19 6:50 AM, Zhigang Lu wrote:
> From: Zhigang Lu
>
> When mmapping an existing hugetlbfs file with MAP_POPULATE, we find
> it is very time consuming. For example, mmapping a 128GB file takes
> about 50 milliseconds. Sampling with perfevent shows it spends 99%
> time in the same_page loop
From: Zhigang Lu
When mmapping an existing hugetlbfs file with MAP_POPULATE, we find
it is very time consuming. For example, mmapping a 128GB file takes
about 50 milliseconds. Sampling with perfevent shows it spends 99%
time in the same_page loop in follow_hugetlb_page().
samples: 205 of event
3 matches
Mail list logo