On 10/11/18 10:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Initialize variable ret to 0 instead of -1. Thanks to Charles Keepax
>>for pointing this out.
>> - Update subject and commit log.
>
> Patch applied with Charles' ACK.
>
Thanks, Linus.
--
Gustavo
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:13 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> There is a potential execution path in which variable *ret* is checked
> in an IF statement, and then its value is used to report an error at
> line 659 without being properly initialized previously:
>
> 659 if (ret)
> 660 dev_err(p
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:13:13PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> There is a potential execution path in which variable *ret* is checked
> in an IF statement, and then its value is used to report an error at
> line 659 without being properly initialized previously:
>
> 659 if (ret)
> 660 de
There is a potential execution path in which variable *ret* is checked
in an IF statement, and then its value is used to report an error at
line 659 without being properly initialized previously:
659 if (ret)
660 dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to write to 0x%x (%d)\n", reg, ret);
Fix this by init
4 matches
Mail list logo
