Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: m41t80: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-10-16 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 04/10/2018 15:07:01+0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Fall" with a proper > "Fall through" comment. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID:

Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: m41t80: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-10-16 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 04/10/2018 15:07:01+0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Fall" with a proper > "Fall through" comment. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID:

[PATCH v2] rtc: m41t80: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-10-04 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Fall" with a proper "Fall through" comment. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373875 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva

[PATCH v2] rtc: m41t80: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-10-04 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "Fall" with a proper "Fall through" comment. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373875 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva