On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:16 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
> * Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 01:34, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:56:52AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > >
* Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 01:34, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:56:52AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > > I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 01:34, Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:56:52AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo,
> > > I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> > > mind please
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:56:52AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> > I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> > mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:56:52AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> > I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> > mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
> >
> >
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
>
> EOM
>
Hi Ingo, while this patch is unnecessary after the series in
Hi Ingo,
I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
EOM
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:49 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:43 AM Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > The x86-64 psABI [0]
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:43 AM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> The x86-64 psABI [0] specifies special relocation types
> (R_X86_64_[REX_]GOTPCRELX) for indirection through the Global Offset
> Table, semantically equivalent to R_X86_64_GOTPCREL, which the linker
> can take advantage of for optimization
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:57 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> Hi Ingo,
> I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
>
> EOM
>
+1
- Sedat -
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:49 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:43 PM Arvind Sankar wrote:
>
> The x86-64 psABI [0] specifies special relocation types
> (R_X86_64_[REX_]GOTPCRELX) for indirection through the Global Offset
> Table, semantically equivalent to R_X86_64_GOTPCREL, which the linker
> can take advantage of for optimization
The x86-64 psABI [0] specifies special relocation types
(R_X86_64_[REX_]GOTPCRELX) for indirection through the Global Offset
Table, semantically equivalent to R_X86_64_GOTPCREL, which the linker
can take advantage of for optimization (relaxation) at link time. This
is supported by LLD and binutils
11 matches
Mail list logo