On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:57:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:14 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:06 PM Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking at it again, my own personal preference would be to swap the order
> > > of the #PF l
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:14 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:06 PM Sean Christopherson
> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at it again, my own personal preference would be to swap the order
> > of the #PF lines.
>
> Yeah, probably.
>
> Also:
>
> > [ 160.246820] BUG: unable to handle ke
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:06 PM Sean Christopherson
wrote:
>
> Looking at it again, my own personal preference would be to swap the order
> of the #PF lines.
Yeah, probably.
Also:
> [ 160.246820] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at beef
> [ 160.247517] #PF: supervisor-pr
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 12:46:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:52 AM Sean Christopherson
> wrote:
> >
> > Remove the per-bit decoding of the error code and instead print:
>
> The patch looks fine to me, so feel free to add an acked-by, but:
>
> (a) I'm not the one w
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:52 AM Sean Christopherson
wrote:
>
> Remove the per-bit decoding of the error code and instead print:
The patch looks fine to me, so feel free to add an acked-by, but:
(a) I'm not the one who wanted the human-legible version in the first
place, since I'm also perfectly
Linus pointed out that deciphering the raw #PF error code and printing
a more human readable message are two different things, and also that
printing the negative cases is mostly just noise[1]. For example, the
USER bit doesn't mean the fault originated in user code and stating
that an oops wasn't
6 matches
Mail list logo