Re: [PATCH v2] x86/tools/relocs: fix big section header tables

2019-01-11 Thread Joe Lawrence
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:57:50AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:56:15PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote: > > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger > > then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size > > member of

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/tools/relocs: fix big section header tables

2018-11-29 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:56:15PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote: > In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger > then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size > member of the initial entry in section header table instead of e_shnum. > Same wit

[PATCH v2] x86/tools/relocs: fix big section header tables

2018-11-29 Thread Artem Savkov
In case when the number of entries in the section header table is larger then or equal to SHN_LORESERVE the size of the table is held in the sh_size member of the initial entry in section header table instead of e_shnum. Same with the string table index which is located in sh_link instead of e_shst