On 17.12.20 19:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/2020 08:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 15.12.20 21:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
it should be interruptible by signals.
Signed-off-by: Juergen
On 16/12/2020 08:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 15.12.20 21:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 15/12/2020 11:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
>>> it should be interruptible by signals.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
>>> ---
>>> V2:
On 15.12.20 21:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 15/12/2020 11:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
it should be interruptible by signals.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
V2:
- don't special case SIGKILL as libxenstore is handling -EINTR
On 15/12/2020 11:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
> it should be interruptible by signals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
> ---
> V2:
> - don't special case SIGKILL as libxenstore is handling -EINTR fine
> ---
>
On 12/15/20 6:10 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
> it should be interruptible by signals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
> ---
> V2:
> - don't special case SIGKILL as libxenstore is handling -EINTR fine
Reviewed-by: Boris
In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver
it should be interruptible by signals.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
V2:
- don't special case SIGKILL as libxenstore is handling -EINTR fine
---
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+),
6 matches
Mail list logo