Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86_64: Sigcontext improvements

2015-03-10 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Sorry, forgot to CC Oleg and Borislav. Let me know if you want me to forward the rest of the thread to you. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Patch 1 is IMO a bug fix. > > Patch 2 is a cleanup and avoids some confusion. It's also sort of an > API break (no ABI change)

[PATCH v2 0/2] x86_64: Sigcontext improvements

2015-03-10 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Patch 1 is IMO a bug fix. Patch 2 is a cleanup and avoids some confusion. It's also sort of an API break (no ABI change) because it removes a struct field. But that struct field has never done anything at all as far as I can tell. AFAICT this series got bogged down in discussion about patch 2

[PATCH v2 0/2] x86_64: Sigcontext improvements

2015-03-10 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Patch 1 is IMO a bug fix. Patch 2 is a cleanup and avoids some confusion. It's also sort of an API break (no ABI change) because it removes a struct field. But that struct field has never done anything at all as far as I can tell. AFAICT this series got bogged down in discussion about patch 2

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86_64: Sigcontext improvements

2015-03-10 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Sorry, forgot to CC Oleg and Borislav. Let me know if you want me to forward the rest of the thread to you. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Patch 1 is IMO a bug fix. Patch 2 is a cleanup and avoids some confusion. It's also sort of an API break