2015-02-26 19:31-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:49:53AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Marcello, Radim,
> >
> > As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
> > with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
> > do next
2015-02-25 22:55-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> > 1) when we have no x2APIC ID 0xff00, but send x2APIC message there
>
> 10.7 SYSTEM AND APIC BUS ARBITRATION
>
> Note that except for the SIPI IPI (see Section 10.6.1, “Interrupt
> Command Register (ICR)”), all bus messages that fail to be
2015-02-26 19:31-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:49:53AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
Marcello, Radim,
As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
do next week.
2015-02-25 22:55-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
1) when we have no x2APIC ID 0xff00, but send x2APIC message there
10.7 SYSTEM AND APIC BUS ARBITRATION
Note that except for the SIPI IPI (see Section 10.6.1, “Interrupt
Command Register (ICR)”), all bus messages that fail to be delivered
to
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:49:53AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Marcello, Radim,
>
> As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
> with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
> do next week.
>
> Regards,
> Nadav
>From what i
Marcello, Radim,
As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
do next week.
Regards,
Nadav
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Radim,
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Radim Krčmář
Marcello, Radim,
As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
do next week.
Regards,
Nadav
Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
Radim,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:41:30PM +0100,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:49:53AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
Marcello, Radim,
As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
do next week.
Regards,
Nadav
From what i understand Radim
Radim,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Each patch has a diff from v1, here is only a prologue on the mythical
> mixed xAPIC and x2APIC mode:
>
> There is one interesting alias in xAPIC and x2APIC ICR destination, the
> 0xff00, which is a broadcast in xAPIC and
Radim,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
Each patch has a diff from v1, here is only a prologue on the mythical
mixed xAPIC and x2APIC mode:
There is one interesting alias in xAPIC and x2APIC ICR destination, the
0xff00, which is a broadcast in xAPIC and
Each patch has a diff from v1, here is only a prologue on the mythical
mixed xAPIC and x2APIC mode:
There is one interesting alias in xAPIC and x2APIC ICR destination, the
0xff00, which is a broadcast in xAPIC and either a physical message
to high x2APIC ID or a message to an empty set in
Each patch has a diff from v1, here is only a prologue on the mythical
mixed xAPIC and x2APIC mode:
There is one interesting alias in xAPIC and x2APIC ICR destination, the
0xff00, which is a broadcast in xAPIC and either a physical message
to high x2APIC ID or a message to an empty set in
12 matches
Mail list logo
