Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: Paravirt remote TLB flush

2017-11-10 15:04 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li : > Remote flushing api's does a busy wait which is fine in bare-metal > scenario. But with-in the guest, the vcpus might have been pre-empted > or blocked. In this scenario, the initator vcpu would end up > busy-waiting for a long amount

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: Paravirt remote TLB flush

2017-11-10 15:04 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li : > Remote flushing api's does a busy wait which is fine in bare-metal > scenario. But with-in the guest, the vcpus might have been pre-empted > or blocked. In this scenario, the initator vcpu would end up > busy-waiting for a long amount of time. > > This

[PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: Paravirt remote TLB flush

Remote flushing api's does a busy wait which is fine in bare-metal scenario. But with-in the guest, the vcpus might have been pre-empted or blocked. In this scenario, the initator vcpu would end up busy-waiting for a long amount of time. This patch set implements para-virt flush tlbs making sure

[PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: Paravirt remote TLB flush

Remote flushing api's does a busy wait which is fine in bare-metal scenario. But with-in the guest, the vcpus might have been pre-empted or blocked. In this scenario, the initator vcpu would end up busy-waiting for a long amount of time. This patch set implements para-virt flush tlbs making sure