Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-10-16 Thread Sultan Alsawaf
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 01:16:18PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/22/20 11:19 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Sultan Alsawaf wrote: > > > >> From: Sultan Alsawaf > >> > >> This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by > >> reducing i2c > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-10-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 9/22/20 11:19 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Sultan Alsawaf wrote: > >> From: Sultan Alsawaf >> >> This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing >> i2c >> xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for >> the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-23 Thread Jarkko Nikula
On 9/17/20 5:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:26 AM Sultan Alsawaf wrote: From: Sultan Alsawaf This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for the designware

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-23 Thread Sultan Alsawaf
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:59:44PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? > > > It > > > looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing > > > machinery before

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-22 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? It > > looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing > > machinery before merging. > > Please give me some more days. I am not fully convinced yet that

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
> Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? It > looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing > machinery before merging. Please give me some more days. I am not fully convinced yet that this use of I2C_M_RECV_LEN is not broken on some

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-22 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Sultan Alsawaf wrote: > From: Sultan Alsawaf > > This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing > i2c > xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for > the designware i2c adapter's I2C_M_RECV_LEN feature, which

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-17 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:26 AM Sultan Alsawaf wrote: > > From: Sultan Alsawaf > > This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing > i2c > xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for > the designware i2c adapter's I2C_M_RECV_LEN

[PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

2020-09-16 Thread Sultan Alsawaf
From: Sultan Alsawaf This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for the designware i2c adapter's I2C_M_RECV_LEN feature, which is documented extensively in the original email thread.