Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active

2013-04-08 Thread Li Zefan
Hi Ingo, Any chance for this patchset and the other one to be queued for 3.10? Both of them has been acked by Peter. On 2013/3/29 18:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:43 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >> cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag. >> >> The flag is needed b

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active

2013-03-29 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:43 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag. > > The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and > cpuacct_account_field() can > be called when cpuacct hasn't been initialized during system bootup. > > This patch initializes cpuacct e

[PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active

2013-03-28 Thread Li Zefan
v2: - rebase against tip-tree - add acked-by I said this patchset needn't to be rebased, which is wrong. The last patch needs rebasing. === cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag. The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and cpuacct_account_fiel