On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:56:31PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:44:55PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
> > optimizations,
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:56:31PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:44:55PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
> > optimizations, probably they want to
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:44:55PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du
>
> Hi all,
> I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
> optimizations, probably they want to apply GCC '-O0' option. But since Linux
> kernel replys
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:44:55PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du
>
> Hi all,
> I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
> optimizations, probably they want to apply GCC '-O0' option. But since Linux
> kernel replys on GCC optimization to
From: Changbin Du
Hi all,
I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
optimizations, probably they want to apply GCC '-O0' option. But since Linux
kernel replys on GCC optimization to remove some dead code, so '-O0' just
breaks the build. They
From: Changbin Du
Hi all,
I know some kernel developers was searching for a method to dissable GCC
optimizations, probably they want to apply GCC '-O0' option. But since Linux
kernel replys on GCC optimization to remove some dead code, so '-O0' just
breaks the build. They do need this because
6 matches
Mail list logo