Hi,
On 05/16/2018 04:56 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu...@linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 4:01 PM
>>
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> Thank you for looking at my patches.
>>
>> On 05/15/2018 10:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:41:15AM +0800, Lu
> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 4:01 PM
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Thank you for looking at my patches.
>
> On 05/15/2018 10:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:41:15AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> >> PATCH 4~9 implement per domain PASI
Hi Joerg,
Thank you for looking at my patches.
On 05/15/2018 10:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:41:15AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> PATCH 4~9 implement per domain PASID table. Current per IOMMU
>> PASID table implementation is insecure in the cases where
>> multiple devices
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:41:15AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> PATCH 4~9 implement per domain PASID table. Current per IOMMU
> PASID table implementation is insecure in the cases where
> multiple devices under one single IOMMU unit support PASID
> feature. With per domain PASID table, we can achieve f
This patch set improves the PASID id and PASID table management
for Intel IOMMU driver.
PATCH 1~3 replace per IOMMU idr name space with a global one.
Current per IOMMU idr doesn't work in some cases where one
application (associated with a PASID) might talk to two physical
devices simultaneously w
5 matches
Mail list logo