Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On 05/17/2017 10:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble steps now. The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to have a consistent state across all

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On 05/17/2017 10:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble steps now. The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to have a consistent state across all

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > On 19 May 2017 at 08:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> >> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict >> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next,

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > On 19 May 2017 at 08:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> >> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict >> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I >> don't see >> the warning and also

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Arnd Bergmann writes: >>> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >>> Arnd Bergmann writes: >>> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble steps now. The first two are required to fix a

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann writes: >> >>> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble >>> steps now. >>> >>> The first two are required to fix a regression

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann writes: >> >>> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble >>> steps now. >>> >>> The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 >>> ("rt2x00: add support

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg > wrote: >> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined >> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, >>^ >>

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg > wrote: >> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined >> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, >>^ >>

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined > static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, >^ >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined > static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, >^ >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble >> steps now. >> >> The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 >> ("rt2x00: add

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > >> I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble >> steps now. >> >> The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 >> ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble > steps now. > > The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 > ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to > have a consistent state across

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

Arnd Bergmann writes: > I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble > steps now. > > The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 > ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to > have a consistent state across all the register

[PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble steps now. The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to have a consistent state across all the register access functions. Arnd

[PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

I've managed to split up my long patch into a series of reasonble steps now. The first two are required to fix a regression from commit 41977e86c984 ("rt2x00: add support for MT7620"), the rest are just cleanups to have a consistent state across all the register access functions. Arnd