Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:35:58 +0100 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > czw., 29 lis 2018 o 15:32 Srinivas Kandagatla > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > Hi Srinivas, > > > > > > if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick > > > up into char-misc? > > > > Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. > > > > --srini > > > > > > Bart > > > > > Boris, are you fine with Srinivas sending the MTD patch as well so > that they stay together? Yes, I'll just need an immutable branch/tag in case we have conflicting changes in the MTD tree.
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:35:58 +0100 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > czw., 29 lis 2018 o 15:32 Srinivas Kandagatla > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > Hi Srinivas, > > > > > > if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick > > > up into char-misc? > > > > Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. > > > > --srini > > > > > > Bart > > > > > Boris, are you fine with Srinivas sending the MTD patch as well so > that they stay together? Yes, I'll just need an immutable branch/tag in case we have conflicting changes in the MTD tree.
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
czw., 29 lis 2018 o 15:32 Srinivas Kandagatla napisał(a): > > > > > > Hi Srinivas, > > > > if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick > > up into char-misc? > > Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. > > --srini > > > > Bart > > Boris, are you fine with Srinivas sending the MTD patch as well so that they stay together? Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
czw., 29 lis 2018 o 15:32 Srinivas Kandagatla napisał(a): > > > > > > Hi Srinivas, > > > > if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick > > up into char-misc? > > Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. > > --srini > > > > Bart > > Boris, are you fine with Srinivas sending the MTD patch as well so that they stay together? Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
Hi Srinivas, if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick up into char-misc? Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. --srini Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
Hi Srinivas, if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick up into char-misc? Patch is fine for me. I normally send all the nvmem patches just before rc5. --srini Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
wt., 13 lis 2018 o 15:01 Bartosz Golaszewski napisał(a):
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> We want to add nvmem support for MTD. TI DaVinci is the first platform
> that will be using it, but only in non-DT mode. In order not to
> introduce any new interface to supporting of which we would have to
> commit - add a new config option that tells nvmem not to use the DT
> node of the parent device.
>
> This way we won't be creating nvmem devices corresponding with MTD
> partitions defined in device tree. By default MTD will set this new
> field to true.
>
> Once a set of bindings for MTD nvmem cells is agreed upon, we'll be
> able to remove this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 9b18ce90f907..ac7971e8154e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
> nvmem_config *config)
> nvmem->priv = config->priv;
> nvmem->reg_read = config->reg_read;
> nvmem->reg_write = config->reg_write;
> - nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
> + if (!config->no_of_node)
> + nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
>
> if (config->id == -1 && config->name) {
> dev_set_name(>dev, "%s", config->name);
> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> index 1e3283c2af77..e53545e9852b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned int
> offset,
> * @ncells:Number of elements in cells.
> * @read_only: Device is read-only.
> * @root_only: Device is accessibly to root only.
> + * @no_of_node:Device should not use the parent's of_node even if
> it's !NULL.
> * @reg_read: Callback to read data.
> * @reg_write: Callback to write data.
> * @size: Device size.
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct nvmem_config {
> int ncells;
> boolread_only;
> boolroot_only;
> + boolno_of_node;
> nvmem_reg_read_treg_read;
> nvmem_reg_write_t reg_write;
> int size;
> --
> 2.19.1
>
Hi Srinivas,
if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick
up into char-misc?
Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 01/25] nvmem: add new config option
wt., 13 lis 2018 o 15:01 Bartosz Golaszewski napisał(a):
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> We want to add nvmem support for MTD. TI DaVinci is the first platform
> that will be using it, but only in non-DT mode. In order not to
> introduce any new interface to supporting of which we would have to
> commit - add a new config option that tells nvmem not to use the DT
> node of the parent device.
>
> This way we won't be creating nvmem devices corresponding with MTD
> partitions defined in device tree. By default MTD will set this new
> field to true.
>
> Once a set of bindings for MTD nvmem cells is agreed upon, we'll be
> able to remove this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 9b18ce90f907..ac7971e8154e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
> nvmem_config *config)
> nvmem->priv = config->priv;
> nvmem->reg_read = config->reg_read;
> nvmem->reg_write = config->reg_write;
> - nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
> + if (!config->no_of_node)
> + nvmem->dev.of_node = config->dev->of_node;
>
> if (config->id == -1 && config->name) {
> dev_set_name(>dev, "%s", config->name);
> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> index 1e3283c2af77..e53545e9852b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned int
> offset,
> * @ncells:Number of elements in cells.
> * @read_only: Device is read-only.
> * @root_only: Device is accessibly to root only.
> + * @no_of_node:Device should not use the parent's of_node even if
> it's !NULL.
> * @reg_read: Callback to read data.
> * @reg_write: Callback to write data.
> * @size: Device size.
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct nvmem_config {
> int ncells;
> boolread_only;
> boolroot_only;
> + boolno_of_node;
> nvmem_reg_read_treg_read;
> nvmem_reg_write_t reg_write;
> int size;
> --
> 2.19.1
>
Hi Srinivas,
if there are no objections - can you Ack this patch for Greg to pick
up into char-misc?
Bart
