Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path

2016-10-27 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 10/26/2016 10:04 AM, Suganath Prabu S wrote: > When device missing event arrives, device_remove_in_progress bit will be > set and hence driver has to stop sending IOCTL commands.Now the check has > been added in IOCTL path to test device_remove_in_progress bit is set, if > so then IOCTL will be

Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path

2016-10-27 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 10/26/2016 10:04 AM, Suganath Prabu S wrote: > When device missing event arrives, device_remove_in_progress bit will be > set and hence driver has to stop sending IOCTL commands.Now the check has > been added in IOCTL path to test device_remove_in_progress bit is set, if > so then IOCTL will be

[PATCH v2 03/11] mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path

2016-10-26 Thread Suganath Prabu S
When device missing event arrives, device_remove_in_progress bit will be set and hence driver has to stop sending IOCTL commands.Now the check has been added in IOCTL path to test device_remove_in_progress bit is set, if so then IOCTL will be failed printing failure message. Signed-off-by:

[PATCH v2 03/11] mpt3sas: Implement device_remove_in_progress check in IOCTL path

2016-10-26 Thread Suganath Prabu S
When device missing event arrives, device_remove_in_progress bit will be set and hence driver has to stop sending IOCTL commands.Now the check has been added in IOCTL path to test device_remove_in_progress bit is set, if so then IOCTL will be failed printing failure message. Signed-off-by: