Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers

On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk > pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to > give us

Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers

On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk > pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to > give us

[PATCH v2 03/13] clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers

Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec,

[PATCH v2 03/13] clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers

Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec,