Sorry, but I just couldn't help myself :)
From: Davidlohr Bueso
Subject: [PATCH] rwsem: no need for explicit signed longs
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
---
lib/rwsem.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
index
Sorry, but I just couldn't help myself :)
From: Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH] rwsem: no need for explicit signed longs
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso davidlohr.bu...@hp.com
---
lib/rwsem.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 03/15/2013 06:54 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are adding this
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 03:54 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
> identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
>
> This is because we want to make different optimizations in
> rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we
On 03/15/2013 06:54 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are adding this
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 03:54 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are adding this pure-duplication
step as a separate commit in order to
Remove the rwsem_down_failed_common function and replace it with two
identical copies of its code in rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed.
This is because we want to make different optimizations in
rwsem_down_{read,write}_failed; we are adding this pure-duplication
step as a separate commit in order to
8 matches
Mail list logo
