On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:48:42PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 15 July 2016 at 18:02, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen
> >>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:48:42PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 15 July 2016 at 18:02, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100,
On 15 July 2016 at 18:02, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>>
On 15 July 2016 at 18:02, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> > On 13
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> > On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten
On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen
>> >
On 15 July 2016 at 13:46, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen
>> > wrote:
>> > > Also, for SMT max capacity is less than
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > > Also, for SMT max capacity is less than 1024 already. No?
> >
> > Yes, it is.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:20PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > > Also, for SMT max capacity is less than 1024 already. No?
> >
> > Yes, it is. I haven't looked in
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen
> >> >
On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen
>> > wrote:
>> >> From: Dietmar
On 13 July 2016 at 18:37, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen
>> > wrote:
>> >> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>> >>
>> >> To be able to compare the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> From: Dietmar Eggemann
> >>
> >> To be able to compare the capacity of the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> From: Dietmar Eggemann
> >>
> >> To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
> >> available cpu
On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>>
>> To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
>> available cpu capacity, store the maximum
On 13/07/16 13:40, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>>
>> To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
>> available cpu capacity, store the maximum per-cpu capacity in the root
>> domain.
>
> I thought
On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>
> To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
> available cpu capacity, store the maximum per-cpu capacity in the root
> domain.
I thought
On 22 June 2016 at 19:03, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Dietmar Eggemann
>
> To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
> available cpu capacity, store the maximum per-cpu capacity in the root
> domain.
I thought that the capacity of all CPUS were built so the
On 12/07/16 12:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
@@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct
On 12/07/16 12:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
@@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct
> >> cpumask *cpu_map,
> >>/* Attach the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:16:06PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> >> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct
> >> cpumask *cpu_map,
> >>/* Attach the
On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask
>> *cpu_map,
>> /* Attach the domains */
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
>>
On 11/07/16 11:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask
>> *cpu_map,
>> /* Attach the domains */
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask
> *cpu_map,
> /* Attach the domains */
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> + rq = cpu_rq(i);
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask
> *cpu_map,
> /* Attach the domains */
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> + rq = cpu_rq(i);
>
From: Dietmar Eggemann
To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
available cpu capacity, store the maximum per-cpu capacity in the root
domain.
cc: Ingo Molnar
cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by:
From: Dietmar Eggemann
To be able to compare the capacity of the target cpu with the highest
available cpu capacity, store the maximum per-cpu capacity in the root
domain.
cc: Ingo Molnar
cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen
---
30 matches
Mail list logo